Tuesday 23 May 2017

Padi Sawah Week 3

Watering Frequency for Week 3

For week 3, we're required to water the plants twice in a week. The plants are watered with 500ml of water on Monday and Thursday.

Sieve Analysis Report

In order to determine the distribution of particles of various sizes present in the soil, sieve analysis was done. In this test, 5 sieves with varying sieve opening mesh sizes were used. The largest mesh size is 2mm while the smallest mesh size is 63µm. The soil was first loaded into the sieve with the largest mesh and shaken in a mechanical shaker for 15 minutes. After 15 minutes, the soils left on each sieve were taken to measure its weight. The weight of soil left on each sieve shows the proportion of size of particle present in the soil. The results for sieve analysis is posted below.

 Soil A: Mengkabong Soil
Sieve Number
Sieve opening mesh size
Mass of soil retained on each sieve(g)
Percent of mass retained on each sieve(Rn)
Cumulative percent retained(% Cumulative passing = 100% - % Cumulative retained)
Percent finer (100 - ∑ Rn)
10
2mm
5.7144
5.0510
5.0510
94.9490
18
1mm
6.0939
5.3863
10.4373
89.5627
70
212µm
78.7790
69.6321
80.0694
19.9306
120
125 µm
8.3077
7.3431
87.4125
12.5875
230
63 µm
8.0489
7.1144
94.5269
5.4731
Pan
--------
6.1921
5.4731
100.0
0.0



Soil B: Parking Lot Kg. E
Sieve Number
Sieve opening mesh size
Mass of soil retained on each sieve(g)
Percent of mass retained on each sieve(Rn)
Cumulative percent retained(% Cumulative passing = 100% - % Cumulative retained)
Percent finer (100 - ∑ Rn)
10
2mm
7.2652
6.0206
6.0206
93.9794
18
1mm
12.1332
10.0547
16.0753
83.9247
70
212µm
35.3546
29.2981
45.3735
54.6265
120
125 µm
22.5092
18.6532
64.0267
35.9733
230
63 µm
18.1452
15.0368
79.0635
20.9365
Pan
--------
25.2644
20.9365
100.0
0.0



Soil C: ODEC
Sieve Number
Sieve opening mesh size
Mass of soil retained on each sieve(g)
Percent of mass retained on each sieve(Rn)
Cumulative percent retained(% Cumulative passing = 100% - % Cumulative retained)
Percent finer (100 - ∑ Rn)
10
2mm
6.4606
4.1879
4.1879
95.8121
18
1mm
13.3743
8.6695
12.8574
87.1426
70
212µm
71.0273
46.0389
58.8963
41.1037
120
125 µm
37.5077
24.3132
83.2095
16.7905
230
63 µm
14.4921
9.3941
92.6036
7.3964
Pan
--------
11.4105
7.3965
100.0
0.0



Soil D: FSSA
Sieve Number
Sieve opening mesh size
Mass of soil retained on each sieve(g)
Percent of mass retained on each sieve(Rn)
Cumulative percent retained(% Cumulative passing = 100% - % Cumulative retained)
Percent finer (100 - ∑ Rn)
10
2mm
6.1529
6.3760
6.3760
93.6240
18
1mm
8.2677
8.5674
14.9434
85.0566
70
212µm
20.8740
21.6308
36.5742
63.4258
120
125 µm
15.6149
16.1810
52.7552
47.2448
230
63 µm
22.6688
23.4907
76.2459
23.7541
Pan
--------
22.9230
23.7541
100.0
0.0



Soil E: 1B
Sieve Number
Sieve opening mesh size
Mass of soil retained on each sieve(g)
Percent of mass retained on each sieve(Rn)
Cumulative percent retained(% Cumulative passing = 100% - % Cumulative retained)
Percent finer (100 - ∑ Rn)
10
2mm
5.8273
3.0371
3.0371
96.9629
18
1mm
5.8416
3.0446
6.0817
93.9183
70
212µm
45.1393
23.5261
29.6078
70.3922
120
125 µm
92.5238
48.2225
77.8303
22.1697
230
63 µm
29.8522
15.5587
93.3890
6.611
Pan
--------
12.6843
6.6109
100.0
0.0


Water Holding Capacity

Water is essential to the growth and survival of plants. So a soil's ability to contain water, otherwise known as water holding capacity is important when determining which soil is the best for growing plants. A test has been carried out to determine the water holding capacity of the 5 soils used in this study. The results are shown below.


Type of soil
Weight of Wet Soil(g)
Mass of Dry Soil(g)
C - Loss in weight(g) = B – A
D - Water Holding Capacity(%) = C/B
With plastic container
A - Without plastic container
With plastic container
B - Without plastic container
A(Mengkabong)
137.9383
131.7452
108.7375
102.5444
29.1998
28.48
B(Parking Lot Kg. E)
111.1598
104.9825
109.2542
103.0769
1.9056
1.85
C(ODEC)
170.9843
164.8161
167.5597
161.3915
3.4246
2.12
D(FSSA Garden)
105.9082
99.7771
94.7432
88.6121
11.165
12.60
E(1B)
201.0363
194.8706
194.7723
188.6076
6.263
3.32

Plant Mass

Besides measuring plant length, another way to track a plant's rate of growth is to measure its dry mass. The initial weight and final weight of plants were measured and recorded below. 


Type of soil
Initial Weight(g)
Final Weight(g)
Change in weight(g)
A(Mengkabong)
-
-
-
B(Parking Lot Kg E)
0.0827
0.0455
0.0372
C(ODEC)
0.0795
0.0432
0.0363
D(FSSA Garden)
0.0819
0.0455
0.0364
E(1B)
0.0648
0.0349
0.0299

Weekly Measurement of Plant Height

For week 3, mistakes were committed as no photos were taken as physical proof for the recording of the plants growth.

A(Mengkabong):

Average Plant Height:-

Signs of Nutrient Deficiencies: -

B(Parking Lot Kg. E):

Average Plant Height: 25.2cm

Signs of Nutrient Deficiencies: Slight yellowing in the leaves.

C(ODEC):

Average Plant Height: 23.8cm

Signs of Nutrient Deficiencies: -

D(FSSA Garden):

Average Plant Height: 26.5cm

Signs of Nutrient Deficiencies: -

E(1Borneo):

Average Plant Height: 21.4cm

Signs of Nutrient Deficiencies: -

Question from Week 2:
What conclusion can be made by this group on the seedlings and root growth of the early stages by analysing the soil pH, soil texture, soil moisture, etc.

From the results, report the group discussion.

Answer: Based on the soil pH, texture, moisture content, and nutrient levels, it can be concluded that the most important factor in the growth of paddy is the soil texture. Of the 5 soils used in this study, the plants grown in Soil B(Kg E Parking Lot) has the greatest gain in height after 2 weeks compared to the other soils. Soil B along with Soil A(Mengkabong) are both clay loam soils, therefore they both have a clay content of about 40% which is suitable for paddy as it needs soil that has high water holding capacity. However, Soil A has more sand than silt while it is the opposite for Soil B. As a matter of fact, all soils used in the study other than Soil B have high percentage of sand in the composition of the soil. Besides water holding capacity, soils with high clay content have another property which is the ability to balance out the soil pH to near neutral after being submerged in water for a while. This is helped by the fact that paddy rice plants can grow in a wide range of pH, which is from 4 to 8. To summarize this entire paragraph, soil texture is probably the most important factor in the initial stages of paddy plant growth.

References: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_are_the_criteria_of_an_ideal_rice_soil

1 comment:

  1. Did the group confirm the result of soil texture type from jar test, textural triangulation with the sieve analysis test?
    Did the results for soil texture from jar test and sieve analysis test correspond with each other?

    Suggestion for easier data interpretation especially with the 2 weeks old plant and after month old data comparison of data recorded is by graphical presentation and table.

    How does nutrient and heavy metal content have relationship with the soil pH?

    For the overall summary report, look back at all the research questions:

    http://hs112017environmentalsoilscience.blogspot.my/p/padi-sawah-mini-project.html

    ReplyDelete