Peanut (Week 4)
Plants' progress:
This week, we have
reduced the day watered the plant. All pots are watered once a week. The amount
of watering the plant is 500ml. Each of the plants was exposed to the same
atmosphere condition.
Pot
|
Soil Sample
|
pH Value
|
Germination Rate
(%)
|
Average plants’
height
(cm)
|
Soil Texture
|
|
pH Meter
|
pH Paper
|
|||||
A
|
Mengkabung
|
5.71
|
5
|
0
|
0.00
|
Sandy loamy clay
|
B
|
FSSA
|
5.69
|
5
|
10
|
27.30
|
Loamy sand
|
C
|
Sepanggar
|
7.79
|
6
|
50
|
26.93
|
Sand
|
D
|
FSSA’s Lake
|
4.77
|
5
|
40
|
28.66
|
Loamy sand
|
E
|
Kg. E
|
6.41
|
6
|
50
|
29.15
|
Loamy sand
|
SIEVE TEST ANALYSIS
On the third week,
we are carry out sieve analysis process by using 5 different type of soil. This
test is carry out to separate the different sizes of particles into course and
fine aggregates by passing through layer of sieves from the largest sieve
opening to the very small opening. Set sieve that we used to separate the soil
particles is 2mm, 1mm, 212um, 125um, and 63um. Air dried soil is weighed before
undergo this process, the result for five type of soil is tabulated as shown
below:
Soil A: Mengkabung
Soil Texture: Sandy
Loamy Clay
Initial Weight:
94.2419 g
Cumulative Weight
after Sieving: 94.2869 g
Sieve
No.
|
Sieve
opening mesh size
|
Mass of
soil retained on sieve (g)
|
Percent
of mass retained on sieve (Rn)
|
Cumulative
percent retained
(%cumulative
passing=100%-% cumulative retained)
|
Percent
Finer
100-Total Rn
|
10
|
2mm
|
1.1472
|
1.2173
|
1.2173
|
98.7827
|
18
|
1mm
|
5.7325
|
6.0828
|
7.3001
|
92.6999
|
70
|
212um
|
79.2302
|
84.0711
|
91.3712
|
8.6288
|
120
|
125um
|
6.027
|
6.3952
|
97.7664
|
2.2336
|
230
|
63um
|
2.0371
|
2.1616
|
99.928
|
0.072
|
PAN
|
-
|
0.0679
|
0.0720
|
100
|
0
|
Soil B: FSSA’s Garden
Soil Texture: Loamy Sand
Initial Weight: 96.9414 g
Cumulative Weight after Sieving: 96.8914 g
Sieve
No.
|
Sieve
opening mesh size
|
Mass of
soil retained on sieve (g)
|
Percent
of mass retained on sieve (Rn)
|
Cumulative
percent retained
(%cumulative
passing=100%-% cumulative retained)
|
Percent
Finer 100- total Rn
|
10
|
2mm
|
6.2134
|
6.4094
|
6.4094
|
93.5906
|
18
|
1mm
|
8.922
|
9.2035
|
15.6129
|
84.3871
|
70
|
212um
|
63.5745
|
65.5803
|
81.1932
|
18.8068
|
120
|
125um
|
14.4325
|
14.8879
|
96.0811
|
3.9434
|
230
|
63um
|
2.8845
|
2.9755
|
99.0566
|
0.9434
|
PAN
|
-
|
0.8645
|
0.8918
|
99.9484
|
0.0516
|
Soil C: Sepanggar
Soil Texture: Sand
Initial Weight: 154.927 g
Cumulative Weight after Sieving: 154.927 g
Sieve
No.
|
Sieve of
Soil retained on sieve
|
Percent
of mass retained on sieve (g)
|
Percent
of mass retained on sieve(Rn)
|
Cumulative
percent retained
(%cumulative
passing=100%-% cumulative retained)
|
Percent
Finer-
total Rn
|
10
|
2mm
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
18
|
1mm
|
0.6141
|
0.3964
|
0.5120
|
99.488
|
70
|
212um
|
130.8202
|
84.4399
|
84.9519
|
15.0481
|
120
|
125um
|
22.3831
|
14.4475
|
99.3994
|
0.6006
|
230
|
63um
|
0.9305
|
0.6006
|
100.0000
|
0
|
PAN
|
-
|
0.1791
|
0.1156
|
100.1156
|
-0.1156
|
Soil D: FSSA’s Lake
Soil Texture: Loamy Sand
Initial Weight: 73.6348 g
Cumulative Weight after Sieving: 73.8997 g
Sieve No
|
Sieve
opening mesh size
|
Mass of
soil retained on sieve(g)
|
Percent
of mass retained on sieve (Rn)
|
Cumulative
percent retained
(%cumulative
passing=100%-%cumulative retained)
|
Percent
finer
100-
total Rn
|
10
|
2mm
|
7.6348
|
10.3685
|
10.3685
|
89.6315
|
18
|
1mm
|
4.8545
|
6.5927
|
16.9612
|
83.0388
|
70
|
212um
|
19.4320
|
26.3897
|
43.3509
|
56.6491
|
120
|
125um
|
18.3451
|
24.9138
|
68.2647
|
31.7353
|
230
|
63um
|
13.6261
|
18.5050
|
86.7697
|
13.2303
|
PAN
|
-
|
10.0072
|
13.5903
|
100.36
|
-0.36
|
Soil E: Kg.E
Soil Texture: Loamy Sand
Initial weight: 121.5916 g
Cumulative Weight after Sieving: 121.0866 g
Sieve No
|
Sieve
opening mesh size
|
Mass of
soil retained on sieve (g)
|
Percent
of mass retained on sieve (Rn)
|
Cumulative
percent retained (%cumulative passing=100%-%cumulative retained)
|
Percent
finer 100- total Rn
|
10
|
2mm
|
6.5341
|
5.3738
|
5.3738
|
94.6262
|
18
|
1mm
|
34.0586
|
28.0107
|
33.3845
|
66.6155
|
70
|
212um
|
69.2029
|
56.9142
|
90.2987
|
9.7013
|
120
|
125um
|
6.1536
|
5.0609
|
95.3596
|
4.6404
|
230
|
63um
|
4.9296
|
4.0542
|
99.4138
|
0.5862
|
PAN
|
-
|
0.2078
|
0.1709
|
99.5847
|
0.4153
|
Heavy Metals
Analysis
Table below shows the result obtained for 5 different soil
at 25, 50 and 100 dilution factor by using this formula :
Based on Figure 1 and Figure 2, shows
that Ca had the highest concentration at sampling C while mostly for heavy
metal Cd can’t be detected by the ICP-MS at sampling B,C,D and E due to not
enough oxidation HNO3 was put making the concentration inside the soil became
over. High Ca level in the soil will help correct the soil acidity, improve
soil structure, help provide proper conditions for microbial growth and
regulates nutrient absorption into the plants. Based on Table 3, for heavy
metals Cd can’t be detected at all for 5 different soils. Some of the heavy
metals also can’t be detected such as As, Ni and Cu. According to Figure 3, it shows
that Ca has the highest concentration out of all the heavy metals. This can be
concludes that most of the soil that we obtained contain the highest Ca inside
it with the information that we can get that it is suitable for agricultural
activities.
Germination
rate
Table 4: The growth of peanut plant over
the period of 4 weeks.
Week
|
Type
of Seed
|
Peanut
|
||||
1
|
Pot
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
Number of seeds planted
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Number of seeds that
germinated
|
0
|
5
|
8
|
5
|
7
|
|
Germination rate (%)
|
0
|
50
|
80
|
50
|
70
|
|
Average plants’ height (cm)
|
0.00
|
6.88
|
7.62
|
6.27
|
7.75
|
|
2
|
Pot
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
Number of seeds planted
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Number of seeds that
germinated
|
0
|
5
|
8
|
5
|
7
|
|
Germination rate (%)
|
0
|
50
|
80
|
50
|
70
|
|
Average plants’ height (cm)
|
0.00
|
17.46
|
14.30
|
15.78
|
20.33
|
|
3
|
Pot
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
Number of seeds planted
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Number of seeds that
germinated
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
|
Germination rate (%)
|
0
|
10
|
50
|
40
|
50
|
|
Average plants’ height (cm)
|
0.00
|
18.76
|
15.23
|
17.58
|
25.33
|
|
4
|
Pot
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
Number of seeds planted
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
Number of seeds that germinated
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
|
Germination rate (%)
|
0
|
10
|
50
|
40
|
50
|
|
Average plants’ height (cm)
|
0.00
|
27.30
|
26.93
|
28.66
|
29.15
|
Germination rate is
the estimation of successful population of seeds. The germination rate provides
a measure of the time course of seed germination. It can be calculated using
the following formula;
For this project, we used 5 types of soil. We have planted 10 seedlings
per pot of peanut plant. Every week the germination rate of each pot were increasing.
But starting from week 3 the germination rate decreased because we have
measured every each pot plants weight and length.
In week one, the highest rapid
growth for the peanut plant is in pot C (sand) and the least growth is in pot A
(sandy loamy clay). This may occur as peanut plant in pot A have a poor
drainage which causing the peanut cannot grow well. In week two, peanut plant
in pot E shows the highest growth. The least growth rate for week two is still
from pot A. In week three, peanut plant in pot E continues to show the highest
growth rate with 25.33cm. Lastly in week four, the plant with the highest
growth plant is in pot E with growth of 29.15cm. The peanut plant in pot A
still does not show any growth.
Average data
In order to measure the degree of growth of plant, 5 plants are chosen
randomly from each pot. Their root length, shoot length, and overall length are
measured and recorded. The fresh weight and dried weight (dry for a week) are
measured and recorded. The results obtained are shown in a table below.
The reading differences will determine the growth rate of plants from each pot.
Data for plants of about one month old:
Table 5 : Average data of shoot, roots and wet and dried
weight of peanut plant
Soil Sample
|
Average Length (cm)
|
Fresh Weight (g)
|
Dried Weight (g)
|
Nodules
|
||
Root
|
Shoot
|
Whole
|
||||
A
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
B
|
13.00
|
27.30
|
40.30
|
15.74
|
12.64
|
13
|
C
|
18.25
|
26.93
|
45.18
|
31.04
|
27.34
|
15
|
D
|
9.43
|
30.65
|
40.08
|
18.15
|
14.18
|
9
|
E
|
9.75
|
30.25
|
40.00
|
12.37
|
10.69
|
11
|
Based on Table 5, we can conclude
that the peanut plant in pot C have the highest length from root to shoot and highest
amount of nodules than the other pot of plant. The peanut is a nitrogen-fixing
plant which is its roots form modules which absorb nitrogen from the air and
provides enrichment and nutrition to the plant and soils. The roots collect
water and nutrients for the plant and secure it to the soil. Plant roots absorb
water through root hairs, which are tiny roots that extend from the root's
epidermis, or the outer layer of the root. Just one cell thick, they absorb
water and nutrients from the soil. So that the plant in pot C has the highest
height among the others and higher amount of nodules.
Table 4 data incorrect for germination rate especially for week 3 and week 4.
ReplyDeleteThe group must remember that you have dug out several plants on week 2 which made the number of plants left in the pot reduced.
The data can't be considered germination rate after 3 weeks if you put the figures like that, it has become how many plants left.