Five different soils samples were used for the mini project, taken from various locations. The soil samples were labeled as S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 respectively.
Table 1: Locations Where the Soil Samples were Collected
S1
|
Kg. Pulau Penampang, Menggatal
|
S2
|
Outdoor Development Centre (ODEC), Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
|
S3
|
Residential College E, UMS (Café area)
|
S4
|
Residential College E, UMS (B1 area)
|
S5
|
Mengkabong Lagoon, Tuaran
|
Each soil sample was first tested for its texture and pH. These two factors are important to know as they affect soil fertility in various ways.
Table 2: Soil Sample and its Soil Texture and pH.
Soil Sample
|
Soil texture
|
pH (Universal indicator)
|
pH (pH Meter)
|
S1
|
Clay
|
5
|
6.15
|
S2
|
Sand
|
6
|
6.76
|
S3
|
Sandy Clay Loam
|
3
|
3.06
|
S4
|
Loam
|
6
|
6.39
|
S5
|
Sandy Loam
|
5
|
5.33
|
As seen in Table 2, S3 was the most acidic of the soils, while S2 and S4 is close to neutral pH. Knowing the soil pH is important as certain plant nutrients are only available in abundance in a certain range of pH such as phosphorus, sulphate, and nitrate which are available mostly within the pH range of 6.0 to 7.5. Comparing Table 2 with Table 3, it can be seen that the soil pH affects the nutrient content. In soil samples S2 and S4 which have slightly acidic soils and is within the nutrient availability range of phosphorus, sulphate, and nitrate, the amount of these nutrients in the soil is relatively high compared to the others. S3, with is high acidity, has relatively lower phosphorus ad nitrate contents while sulphate was out of range of detection. S5, with its pH of 5 has a lower nitrate content compared to S2 and S4, though the phosphorus content is higher compared to the other two. Interestingly, S1 has the lowest nitrate and phosphorus content out of the soil samples despite being the same pH as S2 and S4 according to the universal indicator. However, the clayey soil texture of S1 explains why the phosphorus and nitrate content is low, as these two nutrients tend to leech out from clayey soils. As for the high sulphate readings of S1, the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) that increases in clayey soils may have something to do with it, but no further investigations were done in this part.
Table 3: Phosphorus, Sulphate, and Nitrate Content of the Soil Samples
Soil Type, S
|
Test, T
|
Nutrient (mg/L)
|
||
Phosphorus
|
Sulphate
|
Nitrate
|
||
S1
|
T1
|
0.76
|
128
|
1.20
|
T2
|
0.77
|
128
|
1.20
|
|
T3
|
0.77
|
128
|
1.20
|
|
Mean
|
0.77
|
128
|
1.20
|
|
S2
|
T1
|
1.99
|
27
|
5.60
|
T2
|
2.00
|
26
|
5.60
|
|
T3
|
2.01
|
26
|
5.50
|
|
Mean
|
2.00
|
26.33
|
5.57
|
|
S3
|
T1
|
1.36
|
-
|
1.6
|
T2
|
1.37
|
-
|
1.7
|
|
T3
|
1.35
|
-
|
1.6
|
|
Mean
|
1.36
|
-
|
1.63
|
|
S4
|
T1
|
1.9
|
53
|
10.7
|
T2
|
1.89
|
52
|
10.8
|
|
T3
|
1.86
|
52
|
10.8
|
|
Mean
|
1.88
|
52.33
|
10.77
|
|
S5
|
T1
|
2.19
|
-
|
4.1
|
T2
|
2.20
|
-
|
4.1
|
|
T3
|
2.19
|
-
|
4.1
|
|
Mean
|
2.19
|
-
|
4.1
|
“-“ means out of detection
The soil texture of the soils samples affects the water holding capacity of the soil. Due to the sizes of different soil particles, the water holding capacity varies between different soil textures; sandy soils has the weakest water holding capacity, clay the strongest, with loam in the middle of the two. Water is vital for a plant's survival as well as it is required for seeds to germinate. Table 4 shows the moisture content of the soils after two weeks of drying. S1 has the highest moisture content, since clayey soils have the highest water holding capacity, with S2 having the lowest since the inverse is true for sandy soils. Please note that high water holding capacity does not directly result in fertile soils as clayey soils have poor aeration and sandy soils can produce fertile plants provided plant nutrients are abundant and it is regularly watered. The results of the mini project shows something similar.
Table 4: Moisture Content of Soil Samples After Two Weeks
No. of Sample
|
Weight of empty bowl (W1)
|
Weight of bowl + sample (W2)
|
Weight of bowl + sample after drying for 2
weeks (W3)
|
Moisture Content (%)
[(W2-W3)/(W2-W1)] x 100
|
S1
|
5.00
|
500.00
|
300.00
|
40.40 %
|
S2
|
5.00
|
500.00
|
430.00
|
14.14 %
|
S3
|
5.00
|
500.00
|
400.00
|
20.20 %
|
S4
|
5.00
|
500.00
|
390.00
|
22.22 %
|
S5
|
5.00
|
500.00
|
410.00
|
18.18 %
|
Below are the results of the germination and plant growth of the padi huma bakilong.
Table 5: Germination and Mortality Rate of the Plants in the Soil Samples
Soil Sample
|
Number of seeds planted
|
Number of seeds germinated
|
Rate of germination (%)
|
Rate of mortality (%)
|
S1
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
S2
|
54
|
33
|
61.111
|
38.889
|
S3
|
54
|
31
|
57.407
|
42.592
|
S4
|
54
|
54
|
100
|
0
|
S5
|
54
|
20
|
37.037
|
62.962
|
Figure 1: Rate of Germination and Rate of Mortality |
Soil Sample
|
Week 1 average height (cm)
|
Week 2 average height (cm)
|
Week 3 average height (cm)
|
Week 4 average height (cm)
|
Average height for four weeks (cm)
|
S1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
S2
|
0
|
21.833
|
23.000
|
24.367
|
23.067
|
S3
|
0
|
8.633
|
16.833
|
24.300
|
16.589
|
S4
|
0
|
13.000
|
27.000
|
38.733
|
26.244
|
S5
|
0
|
0
|
8.200
|
9.167
|
5.789
|
Figure 2: Growth Rate of the Soil Samples |
No comments:
Post a Comment